Today morning while going through the newspaper The Hindu, I came across an article titles "You Can't Read This Book." Turns out that a British journalist named Nick Cohen has come out with his new book which is titled "You Can't Read This Book: Censorship in an Age of Freedom." Finding the first few lines interesting, I read further to find out that the article gives information about many books which have been banned over the period of time.
After reading the full article I was able to pinpoint only 3 reasons as to why books are banned
ReligionAfter reading the full article I was able to pinpoint only 3 reasons as to why books are banned
- Religion
- History
- Truth
In any and every corner of the world you go, you'll find this 8 letter word creating controversy in some or the other form. Some author comes up with his/her opinion about some religion which does not quite fare well with a bunch of people and there you have it, a perfect recipe to prepare a well cooked controversy which will indeed be followed by a lot of fuss, media attention, riots and an eventual ban imposed on the book.
The wings of the authors imagination are clipped even before he could demonstrate how high he can fly.
History
Just one word out of the 16000 odd words (Wikipedia says that an average novel has 16000 words) is enough for your months and years of hard-work and research to be banned forever. Just because you metaphorically called a historical king or war hero a rat or maybe something similar. The author was perhaps being clever and tried to use the best metaphor possible to describe a particular quality. But perhaps he was being "a little too clever" for a few people's liking.
Truth
I believe some of the books are banned just because the truth uncovered by the author in the book is just too hard for the people to digest. That is why we add the adjective bitter before the word truth. But we must remember that most of the medicines which are used to cure diseases also taste bitter (considerably less in todays world, thanks to artificial sweeteners).
But the questions till remains, how appropriate is it to ban such books?
In most of the cases the books are banned because a certain group of people do not want the rest of the world to read the book because the author has written something which has hurt their sentiments. So if you do not want the people to read what the author has written, then why create such a huge fuss about the book and bring it in the spot light in the first place? Not only bring the book in the spot light but also globally disclose what is it that the author has written which has hurt you sentiments. HELLO!!! Was it not the same part that you wanted the people to not know in the first place? Don't you think by doing so they end up gaining more attention and a whole lot of people coming to know about the stuff you didn't wanted them to know? So how exactly did the ban serve its purpose?
The "Censorship in an Age of Freedom" part in Nick Cohens books title does indeed make you think, "Just how free are we, in this Age of Freedom?"